Sunday 1 July 2012

Letrozole 2.5mg film-coated tablets (Zentiva)





1. Name Of The Medicinal Product



Letrozole 2.5 mg film-coated tablets


2. Qualitative And Quantitative Composition



Each tablet contains 2.5 mg letrozole.



Excipient: each tablet contains 61.5 mg lactose monohydrate.



For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1.



3. Pharmaceutical Form



Film-coated tablet.



Yellow film-coated round biconvex tablets, debossed with L9OO on one side and 2.5 on the other side.



4. Clinical Particulars



4.1 Therapeutic Indications



• Adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer.



• Extended adjuvant treatment of hormone-dependent early breast cancer in postmenopausal women who have received prior standard adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 5 years.



• First-line treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent advanced breast cancer.



• Advanced breast cancer in women with natural or artificially induced postmenopausal status after relapse or disease progression, who have previously been treated with anti-oestrogens.



Efficacy has not been demonstrated in patients with hormone-receptor negative breast cancer.



4.2 Posology And Method Of Administration



Adults and elderly patients



The recommended dose of letrozole is 2.5 mg once daily. No dose adjustment is required for elderly patients.



In the adjuvant setting, it is recommended to treat for 5 years or until tumour relapse occurs. In the adjuvant setting, clinical experience is available for 2 years (median duration of treatment was 25 months).



In the extended adjuvant setting, clinical experience is available for 4 years (median duration of treatment).



In patients with advanced or metastatic disease, treatment with letrozole should continue until tumour progression if evident.



Children



Not applicable.



Patients with hepatic and/or renal impairment



No dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance greater than 30 ml/min.



Insufficient data are available in cases of renal insufficiency with creatinine clearance lower than 30 ml/min or in patients with severe hepatic insufficiency (see sections 4.4 and 5.2).



4.3 Contraindications



Letrozole is contraindicated in:



• Patients with known hypersensitivity to letrozole or to any of the excipients.



• Premenopausal endocrine status; pregnancy; lactation (see sections 4.6 and 5.3).



4.4 Special Warnings And Precautions For Use



In patients whose postmenopausal status seems unclear, LH, FSH and/or oestradiol levels must be assessed before initiating treatment in order to clearly establish menopausal status.



Renal impairment



Letrozole has not been investigated in a sufficient number of patients with a creatinine clearance lower than 10 ml/min. The potential risk/benefit to such patients should be carefully considered before administration of letrozole.



Hepatic impairment



Letrozole has only been studied in a limited number of non-metastatic patients with varying degrees of hepatic function: mild to moderate, and severe hepatic insufficiency. In non-cancer male volunteers with severe hepatic impairment (liver cirrhosis and Child-Pugh score C), systemic exposure and terminal half-life were increased 2-3 fold compared to healthy volunteers. Thus, letrozole should be administered with caution and after careful consideration of the potential risk/benefit to such patients (see section 5.2).



Bone effects



Letrozole is a potent oestrogen-lowering agent. In the adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting the median follow-up duration of 30 and 49 months respectively is insufficient to fully assess fracture risk associated with long term use of letrozole. Women with a history of osteoporosis and/or fractures or who are at increased risk of osteoporosis should have their bone mineral density formally assessed by bone densitometry prior to the commencement of adjuvant and extended adjuvant treatment and be monitored for development of osteoporosis during and following treatment with letrozole. Treatment or prophylaxis for osteoporosis should be initiated as appropriate and carefully monitored (see section 4.8).



Letrozole tablets contain lactose. Patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicine.



4.5 Interaction With Other Medicinal Products And Other Forms Of Interaction



Clinical interaction studies with cimetidine and warfarin indicated that the coadministration of letrozole with these drugs does not result in clinically significant drug interactions.



Additionally, a review of the clinical trial database indicated no evidence of clinically relevant interactions with other commonly prescribed drugs.



There is no clinically experience to date on the use of letrozole in combination with other anticancer agents.



In vitro, letrozole inhibits the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 2A6 and, moderately, 2C19. Thus, caution should be used in the concomitant administration of drugs whose disposition is mainly dependent on these isoenzymes and whose therapeutic index is narrow.



4.6 Pregnancy And Lactation



Women of perimenopausal status or child-bearing potential



The physician needs to discuss the necessity of a pregnancy test before initiating letrozole and of adequate contraception with women who have the potential to become pregnant (i.e. women who are perimenopausal or who recently became postmenopausal) until their postmenopausal status is fully established (see sections 4.4 and 5.3).



Pregnancy



Letrozole is contraindicated during pregnancy (see sections 4.3 and 5.3).



Lactation



Letrozole is contraindicated during lactation (see section 4.3).



4.7 Effects On Ability To Drive And Use Machines



Fatigue and dizziness have been observed with the use of letrozole and somnolence has been reported uncommonly. Therefore, caution is advised when driving or using machines.



4.8 Undesirable Effects



Letrozole was generally well tolerated across all studies as first-line and second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer and as adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. Up to approximately one third of the patients treated with letrozole in the metastatic setting, up to approximately 70-75% of the patients in the adjuvant setting (both letrozole and tamoxifen arms), and up to approximately 40% of the patients treated in the extended adjuvant setting (both letrozole and placebo arms) experienced adverse reactions. Generally, the observed adverse reactions are mainly mild or moderate in nature. Most adverse reactions can be attributed to normal pharmacological consequences of oestrogen deprivation (e.g hot flushes).



The most frequently reported adverse reactions in the clinical studies were hot flushes, arthralgia, nausea, and fatigue. Many adverse reactions can be attributed to the normal pharmacological consequences of oestrogen deprivation (e.g hot flushes, alopecia and vaginal bleeding).



After standard adjuvant tamoxifen, based on median follow-up of 28 months, the following adverse events irrespective of causality were reported significantly more often with letrozole than with placebo- hot flushes (50.7% vs. 44.3%), arthralgia/arthritis (28.5% vs. 23.2%) and myalgia (10.2%vs. 7.0%). The majority of these adverse events were observed during the first year of treatment. There was a higher but non significant incidence of osteoporosis and bone fractures in patients who received letrozole than in patients who received placebo (7.5% vs. 6.3% and 6.7% vs. 5.9%, respectively).



In an updated analysis in the extended adjuvant setting conducted at a median treatment duration of 47 months for letrozole and 28 months for placebo, the following adverse events irrespective of causality were reported significantly more often with letrozole than with placebo: hot flushes (60.3% vs. 52.6%), arthralgia/arthritis (37.9% vs. 26.8%) and myalgia (15.8% vs. 8.9%). The majority of these adverse events were observed during the first year of treatment. In the patients in placebo arm who switched to letrozole a similar pattern of general events was observed. There was a higher incidence of osteoporosis and bone fractures, any time after randomisation, in patients who received letrozole than in patients who received placebo (12.3% vs. 7.4% and 10.9% vs. 7.2%, respectively). In patients who switched to letrozole, newly diagnosed osteoporosis, any time after switching, was reported in 3.6% of patients while fracture were reported in 5.1% of patients any time after switching.



In the adjuvant setting, irrespective of causality, the following adverse events occurred any time after randomization in the letrozole and tamoxifen groups respectively: thromboembolic events (1.5% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001), angina pectoris (0.8% vs. 0.8%,), myocardial infarction (0.7% vs. 0.4%) and cardiac failure (0.9% vs 0.4%, p=0.006).



The following adverse drug reactions, listed in Table 1 were reported from clinical studies and from post marketing experience with letrozole.



Adverse reactions are ranked under headings of frequency, the most frequent first, using the following convention:



very common (



Table 1:










































































































































Infections and infestations


 


Uncommon:




Urinary tract infection



 
 


Neoplasms, benign, malignant and unspecified (including cysts and polyps)


 


Uncommon:




Tumour pain (not applicable in the adjuvant and extended adjuvant setting)



 
 


Blood and the lymphatic system disorders


 


Uncommon:




Leukopenia



 
 


Metabolism and nutrition disorders


 


Common:




Anorexia, appetite increase, hypercholesterolaemia




Uncommon:




General oedema



 
 


Psychiatric disorders


 


Common:




Depression




Uncommon:




Anxiety (including nervousness), irritability



 
 


Nervous system disorders


 


Common:




Headache, dizziness




Uncommon:




Somnolence, insomnia, memory impairment, dysesthesia (including paresthesia and hypoesthesia), taste disturbance, cerebrovascular accident



 
 


Eye disorders


 


Uncommon:




Cataract, eye irritation, blurred vision



 
 


Cardiac disorders


 


Uncommon:




Palpitations, tachycardia



 
 


Vascular disorders


 


Uncommon:




Thrombophlebitis (including superficial and deep thrombophlebitis), hypertension, ischemic cardiac events




Rare:




Pulmonary embolism, arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular infarction



 
 


Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders


 


Uncommon:




Dyspnoea, cough



 
 


Gastrointestinal disorders


 


Common:




Nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, constipation, diarrhoea




Uncommon:




Abdominal pain, stomatitis, dry mouth



 
 


Hepatobiliary disorders


 


Uncommon:




Increased hepatic enzymes




Not known:




hepatitis



 
 


Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders


 


Very common:




Increased sweating




Common:




Alopecia, rash (including erythematous, macullopapular, psoriaform, and vesicular rash)




Uncommon:




Pruritus, dry skin, urticaria




Not known:




Anaphylactic reaction, Angioedema, toxic epidermal necrolysis, erythema multiform



 
 


Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders


 


Very common:




Arthralgia




Common:




Myalgia, bone pain, osteoporosis, bone fractures




Uncommon:




Arthritis



 
 


Renal and urinary disorders


 


Uncommon:




Increased urinary frequency



 
 


Reproductive system and breast disorders


 


Uncommon:




Vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, vaginal dryness, breast pain



 
 


General disorders and administration site conditions


 


Very common:




Hot flushes, fatigue including asthenia




Common:




Malaise, peripheral oedema




Uncommon:




Pyrexia, mucosal dryness, thirst



 
 


Investigations


 


Common:




Weight increase




Uncommon:




Weight loss



4.9 Overdose



Isolated cases of overdosage with letrozole have been reported.



No specific treatment for overdosage is known. Treatment should be symptomatic and supportive.



5. Pharmacological Properties



5.1 Pharmacodynamic Properties



Pharmacotherapeutic group: enzyme inhibitors



ATC Code: L02B G04



Non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (inhibitor of oestrogen biosynthesis); antineoplastic agent.



Pharmacodynamic effects



The elimination of oestrogen-mediated growth stimulation is a prerequisite for tumour response in cases where the growth of tumour tissue depends on the presence of oestrogens and endocrine therapy is used. In postmenopausal women, oestrogens are mainly derived from the action of the aromatase enzyme, which converts adrenal androgens - primary androstenedione and testosterone - to oestrone and oestradiol. The suppression of oestrogen biosynthesis in peripheral tissues and the cancer tissue itself can therefore be achieved by specifically inhibiting aromatase enzyme.



Letrozole is a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It inhibits the aromatase enzyme by competitively binding to the haem of the aromatase cytochrome P450, resulting in a reduction of oestrogen biosynthesis in all tissues where present.



In healthy postmenopausal women, single doses of 0.1, 0.5 and 2.5 mg letrozole suppresses serum oestrone and oestradiol by 75-78% and 78% from baseline respectively. Maximum suppression is achieved in 48-78h.



In postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, daily doses of 0.1 to 5 mg suppress plasma concentration of oestradiol, oestrone, and oestrone sulphate by 75-95% from baseline in all patients treated. With doses of 0.5 mg and higher, many values of oestrone and oestrone sulphate are below the limit of detection in the assays, indicating that higher oestrogene suppression is achieved with these doses. Oestrogen suppression was maintained throughout treatment in all these patients.



Letrozole is highly specific in inhibiting aromatase activity. Impairment of adrenal steroidogenesis has not been observed. No clinically relevant changes were found in the plasma concentrations of cortisol, aldosterone, 11-deoxycortisol, 17- hydroxyprogesterone, and ACTH or in plasma renin activity among postmenopausal patients treated with a daily dose of letrozole 0.1 to 5 mg. The ACTH stimulation test performed after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment with daily doses of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 mg did not indicate any attenuation of aldosterone or cortisol production. Thus, glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid supplementation is not necessary.



No changes were noted in plasma concentrations of androgens (androstenedione and testosterone) among healthy postmenopausal women after 0.1, 0.5 and 2.5 mg single doses of letrozole or in plasma concentrations of androstenedione among postmenopausal patients treated with daily doses of 0.1 to 5 mg, indicating that the blockade of oestrogen biosynthesis does not lead to accumulation of androgenic precursors. Plasma levels of LH and FSH are not affected by letrozole in patients, nor is thyroid function as evaluated by TSH, T4, and T3 uptake test.



Adjuvant treatment



A multicenter, double-blind study randomized over 8000 postmenopausal women with resected receptor-positive early breast cancer, to one of the following option:



Option 1:



A. tamoxifen for 5 years



B. letrozole for 5 years



C. tamoxifen for 2 years followed by letrozole for 3 years



D. letrozole for 2 years followed by tamoxifen for 3 years



Option 2:



A. tamoxifen for 5 years



B letrozole for 5 years



Data in Table 2 reflect results based on data from the monitoring arms in each randomization option and data from the two switching arms up to 30 days after the data of switch. The analysis of monotherapy vs sequencing of endocrine treatments will be conducted when the necessary number of events has been achieved.



Patients have been followed for a median of 26 months, 76% of the patients for more than 2 years, and 16% (1252 patients) for 5 years or longer.



The primary endpoint of the trial was disease-free survival (DFS) which was assessed as the time from randomization to the earliest event of loco-regional or distant recurrence (metastases) of the primary disease, development of invasive contralateral breast cancer, appearance of a second non-breast primary or death from any cause without a prior cancer event. Letrozole reduced the risk of recurrence by 19% compared with tamoxifen (hazard ratio 0.81; P=0.003). The 5-year DFS rates were 84.0% for letrozole and 81.4% for tamoxifen. The improvement in DFS with letrozole is seen as early as 12 months and is maintained beyond 5 years. Letrozole also significantly reduced the risk compared to tamoxifen whether prior adjuvant chemotherapy was given (hazard ratio 0.72; P=0.018) or not (hazard ratio 0.84; p=0.044).



For the secondary endpoint overall survival a total of 358 deaths were reported (166 on letrozole and 192 on tamoxifen). There was no significant difference between treatments in overall survival (hazard ratio 0.86; P=0.15). Distant disease-free survival (distant metastases), a surrogate for overall survival, differed significantly overall (hazard ratio 0.73; P=0.001) and in pre-specified stratification subsets. Letrozole significantly reduced the risk of systemic failure by 17% compared with tamoxifen (hazard ratio 0.83; P=0.02).



However, although in favour of letrozole non significant difference was obtained in the occurrence of contralateral breast cancer (hazard ratio 0.61; P=0.09). An explanatory analysis of DFS by nodal status showed that letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in reducing the risk of recurrence in patients with node positive disease (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.59, 0.85; P=0.0002) while no significant difference between treatments was apparent in patients with node negative disease (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.77, 1.25; P=0.89). This reduced benefit in node negative patients was confirmed by an explanatory interaction analysis (p=0.03).



Patients receiving letrozole, compared to tamoxifen, had fewer second malignancies (1.9% vs. 2.4%). Particularly the incidence of endometrial cancer was lower with letrozole compared to tamoxifen (0.2% vs. 0.4%).



See Tables 2 and 3 that summarize the results. The analyses summarized in Table 4 omit the 2 sequential arms from randomization option 1, i.e. take account only of the monotherapy arms.



Table 2: Disease free and overall survival (ITT population)

































 


letrozole



n=4003




tamoxifen



n=4007




hazard ratio



(95% CI)1




P -value2




Disease-free survival (primary)



- events (protocol definition, total)




351




428




0.81 (0.70, 0.93)




0.0030




Distant disease-free survival (metastases) (secondary)




184




249




0.73 (0.60, 0.88)




0.0012




Overall survival (secondary)



- number of deaths (total)




166




192




0.86 (0.70, 1.06)




0.1546




Systemic disease-free survival (secondary)




323




383




0.83 (0.72, 0.97)




0.0172




Contralateral breast cancer (invasive) (secondary)




19




31




0.61 (0.35, 1.08)




0.0910



1 CI: confidence interval



2 Logrank test, stratified by randomization option and use of prior adjuvant chemotherapy



Table 3: Disease-free and overall survival by nodal status and prior adjuvant chemotherapy (ITT population)

































 


hazard ratio (95% CI)1




p-value2




Disease-free survival:


  


Nodal status



- Positive



- Negative




 



0.71 (0.59, 0.85)



0.98 (0.77, 1.25)




 



0.0002



0.8875




Prior adjuvant chemotherapy



- Yes



- No




 



0.72 (0.55, 0.95)



0.84 (0.71, 1.00)




 



0.0178



0.0435




Overall survival:



 

 


Nodal status



- Positive



- Negative




 



0.81 (0.63, 1.05)



0.88 (0.59, 1.30)




 



0.1127



0.5070




Prior adjuvant chemotherapy



- Yes



- No




 



0.76 (0.51, 1.14)



0.90 (0.71, 1.15)




 



0.1848



0.3951




Distant disease-free survival:


  


Nodal status



- Positive



- Negative




 



0.67 (0.54, 0.84)



0.90 (0.60, 1.34)




 



0.0005



0.5973




Prior adjuvant chemotherapy



- Yes



- No




 



0.69 (0.50, 0.95)



0.75 (0.60, 0.95)




 



0.0242



0.0184



1 CI: confidence interval



2 Cox model significance level



Table 4: Primary Core Analysis: Efficacy endpoints according to randomization option monotherapy arms (ITT population)

































































































































endpoint




option




statistic




letrozole




tamoxifen




Disease free survival



(primary, protocol definition)




1




Events / n




100/ 1546




137/ 1548



 

 


HR1 (95% CI2 ), P3




0.73 (0.56, 0.94), 0.0159


 

 


2




Events / n




177 / 917




202/ 911



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.85 (0.69, 1.04), 0.1128


 

 


Overall




Events/ n




277 / 2463




339 / 2459



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.80 (0.68, 0.94), 0.0061


 


Disease free survival (excluding second malignancies)




1




Events/ n




80/ 1546




110 / 1548



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.73 (0.54, 0.97), 0.0285


 

 


2




Events/ n




159 / 917




187 / 911



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.82 (0.67, 1.02) 0.0753


 

 


Overall




Events/ n




239 / 2463




297 / 2459



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.79 (0.66, 0.93), 0.0063


 


Distant disease free survival (secondary)




1




Events/ n




57 / 1546




72 / 1548



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.79 (0.56, 1.12) 0.1913


 

 


2




Events/ n




98 / 917




124 / 911



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.77 (0.59, 1.00), 0.0532


 

 


Overall




Events/ n




155 / 2463




196 / 2459



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.78 (0.63, 0.96), 0.0195


 


Overall survival (secondary)




1




Events/ n




41 / 1546




48 / 1548



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.86 (0.56, 1.30), 0.4617


 

 


2




Events/ n




98 / 917




116 / 911



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.84 (0.64, 1.10), 0.1907


 

 


Overall




Events/ n




139 / 2463




164 / 2459



 

 


HR (95% CI), P




0.84 (0.67, 1.06), 0.1340


 


1 HR = hazard ratio



2 CI = confidence interval



3P-value given is based on logrank test, stratified by adjuvant chemotherapy for each randomization option, and by randomization option and adjuvant chemotherapy for overall analysis



The median duration of treatment (safety population) was 25 months, 73% of the patients were treated for more than 2 years, 22% of the patients for more than 4 years. The median duration of follow-up was 30 months for

No comments:

Post a Comment